Legal Opinion
McMaster Construction, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 5, 1991No. 91-1269CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action for injunctive relief brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a) (1988). McMaster Construction, Inc. sues to enjoin the award by the Corps of Engineers to the defendant-intervenor Webb Brothers Construction of Haskell, Inc. (“Webb”) of a contract for placement of riprap. McMaster was the apparent low bidder on the sealed bid contract. Webb was the apparent second low bidder. The sole basis of the bid protest is McMaster’s challenge to the validity of 48 C.F.R. § 3.104-9(b)(3)(i)(C) (1990) (hereafter, the “responsiveness regulation”). For the reasons which…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Commercial Office Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Southfork Systems, Inc. v. The United States, and State of Texas, Acting Through the Texas Commission for the BlindCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Aerolease Long Beach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- PCI/RCI v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Y.S.K. Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- S.J. Amoroso Construction Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.