Legal Opinion

Y.S.K. Construction Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 18, 1994No. 93-738PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This bid protest action is before the court following a hearing on the merits. Plaintiff asserts that the government has breached its implied-in-fact contract to consider plaintiffs bid fairly and honestly. It contends that the Small Business Administration (SBA), in derogation of statute and regulation, refused to determine whether the low bidder on a contract set aside for Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDB) actually was an SDB. Defendant asserts that the SBA rightly declined to determine the low bidder’s SDB status. The court concludes that SBA wrongly refused to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Overstreet Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. Ceres Environmental Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. Aero Corp., S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  4. Moore's Cafeteria Services v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Nutech Laundry & Textile, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API