S.J. Amoroso Construction Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
S.J. Amoroso appeals the district court’s summary judgment for the General Services Administration (GSA) concerning its rejection of Amoroso’s bid for the partial renovation of a federal building. In both the action below and this appeal, Amoroso challenged as arbitrary and capricious Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.203-8, which requires the submission of a Certificate of Procurement Integrity (CPI) with the sealed bid. We affirm.
I
FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
The GSA invited sealed bids for the renovation of part of a building located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Vogel Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- William Michael Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992