Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 6, 1946No. 45800PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLittuetoN, Judge
Defendant advertised for bids early in 1942 for furnishing and installing an interoffice communication system in the Office of the Port Director, Third Naval District at New York. Plaintiff’s bid of $935 for a Bogen Communo Phone Installation, an interoffice communication loud speaker system offered by it, was accepted and on March 17, 1942, a contract on the Standard Form 23 for supplies was executed. E. N. Dudgeon, of the Navy Purchasing Office at New York, *235signed the contract on behalf of defendant, as contracting officer. No performance bond was required. The specification provided in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. California Bridge & Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. AxmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- American Bonding & Trust Co. v. Gibson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
- George Leary Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Seaboard Lumber Company and Capital Development Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Armour of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Universal Shelters of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.