Legal Opinion
Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 7, 1998No. Nos. 95-85C, 370-88C, 464-88C, 610-84C, 750-87CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
These cases, Capital Development Company v. the United States, No. 750-87C; Cascade Resources v. the United States, No. 464-88C; Merrill and Ring, Inc. v. the United States, No. 95-85C; Seaboard Lumber Company v. the United States, No. 610-84C; and Seaboard Lumber Company v. the United States, No. 370-88C; come before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment after a long history of interlocutory appeal and stays pending the outcome of other litigation. At issue is whether plaintiffs’ breaches of various federal timber contracts are legally excusable. Defendant…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pitney Bowes Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Seaboard Lumber Company and Capital Development Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Hemlock Semiconductor Operations, LLC v. SolarWorld Industries Sachsen GmbHCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Conner Brothers Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.