Legal Opinion
United States v. Dinwiddie
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided March 21, 1995No. 95-0010-CV-W-8PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
STEVENS, Chief Judge.
The Court grants plaintiffs’ application filed on January 6, 1995 for permanent injunction to enjoin defendant from violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994 (“FACE”), Pub.L. No. 103-259, 108 Stat. 694 (1994) (to be codified at 18 U.S.C. § 248), which was signed by President Clinton on May 26, 1994.
I. Procedural History
On January 6, 1995, plaintiffs filed: (1) a complaint 1 to enjoin defendant from violating FACE; and (2) an application for temporary restraining order and further injunctive relief pursuant to FACE and Rule 65 of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Regina Rene DinwiddieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. DeFluiterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- United States v. LuceroDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Lucero v. TroschDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1995
- United States v. McMillanDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.