Legal Opinion
United States v. Regina Rene Dinwiddie
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 9, 1996No. 95-1803WMPublishedCited by 170 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Regina Rene Dinwiddie appeals from the District Court’s order finding that she violated the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994, 18 U.S.C. § 248 (“FACE”). The order prohibits Mrs. Din-widdie from further violating FACE and from engaging in a number of other activities whenever she is within 500 feet of a facility that provides reproductive-health services. See United States v. Dinwiddie, 885 F.Supp. 1286 (W.D.Mo.1995). We affirm the District Court’s holding that FACE is constitutional and that Mrs. Dinwiddie violated FACE, but remand to the…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- McTernan v. City of York, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Roe v. Aware Woman Center for Choice, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Bryan Kirby Barrett, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Gerardo Acevedo, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Hearn v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
- John Doe, a Minor, by His Mother and Next Friend, Jane Doe v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.