Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. DeFluiter

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1983No. 3-483A96PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Presiding Judge.

The parties stipulated to the following set of facts. On May 16, 1976, David DeFluiter was involved in an accident with an uninsured motorist. The uninsured motorist's negligence was the sole cause of the accident. DeFluiter owned three automobiles which were insured by appellant, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, (U.S.F. & G.). However, the accident occurred while DeFluiter was operating a mo-toreycle which he owned but had not insured with U.S.F. & G.

DeFluiter submitted a personal injury claim to U.S.F. & G. based upon the uninsured motorist provision of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Vernon Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. SharpIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. J. I. Case Co. v. SandefurIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  3. City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Seymour National Bank v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RobertsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Edward Electric Co. v. Automation, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Van Winkle v. NashIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Meridian Mutual Insurance Co v. RichieIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. American Underwriters Group, Inc. v. WilliamsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Haimbaugh Landscaping, Inc. v. JegenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API