Legal Opinion
United States v. Lucero
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 25, 1995No. 95-10036-01, 95-10036-02PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THEIS, District Judge.
Defendants are charged with interfering by physical obstruction with persons obtaining or providing reproductive health services in violation of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, 18 U.S.C. § 248(a)(1). Specifically, the United States alleges that the defendants welded themselves into vehicles, thereby blocking the entrances to a clinic in Wichita, Kansas, where abortions are performed.
The matter is before the court on motions filed by the defendants and by the United States. Defendants move first for dismissal of the charges on the ground…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Regina Rene DinwiddieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. George WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elton Lee FUNCHES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. ScottDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- v. ScottColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.