Legal Opinion

Lucero v. Trosch

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided November 1, 1995No. Civ. A. 95-0308-CB-MPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BUTLER, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. After careful consideration of the arguments raised by both parties in their briefs, the court finds that the motion is due to be GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part.

I. Factual Background 1

Plaintiff Bruce Lucero, M.D. (“Lucero”) is a physician who provides reproductive health services, including abortions, at the New Woman All Women Health Care Clinic in Birmingham, Alabama. On October 5, 1994, Lucero and defendant Fr. David…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Cheffer v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Abdel-Jabbor Malik, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. McMillanDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1999
  2. United States v. ScottDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
  3. Lucero v. TroschDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1996
  4. United States v. Nathan Wall (95-5007) and Donald Wall (95-5008)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Nathan Wall (95-5007) and Donald Wall (95-5008)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API