Monson v. Fischer
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
This is an appeal from so much of an order taxing costs on appeal as allows to defendant an item of $116 incurred by her as costs on trial of the action in the court below.
The trial on its merits resulted in judgment for plaintiffs, which was reversed on appeal (Monson v. Fischer, 118 Cal. App. 503 [5 Pac. (2d) 628]). Under section 1034 of the Code of Civil Procedure and within the time allowed, defendant filed a memorandum covering her costs on appeal and included therein the aforesaid item. Plaintiffs moved to retax said costs by striking from the bill said item. This motion was denied and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. LakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- In Re Estate of PuseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Monson v. FischerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Markart v. ZeimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Erlin v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Friends of Mammoth v. Town of Mammoth Lakes Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LagissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Weightman v. HadleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.