Legal Opinion
Weightman v. Hadley
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 1956No. Civ. 20992, 20993PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Plaintiff brought this action against George H. Hadley, Sr., for rescission of a sale of an interest in an oil lease and corporate stock to Hadley; for a money judgment against Hadley; and to establish interests in oil leases under an alleged joint venture. The issues involved: (1) a bonus received by Hadley under the “Richardson” lease; (2) rescission for fraud of a sale of an interest in the “Stone” lease; (3) proceeds of the sale of and a dividend on stock in Norris Oil Company; (4) an interest in an oil lease from Norris Oil Company to Hadley; and (5) an interest in a purported…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. CarswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSN. OF SAN DIEGO, INC. v. City of OceansideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LagissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Salaman v. BoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.