Verrett v. Silver
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Yetka, Justice.
This is a dog-bite action brought by plaintiffs pursuant to Minn. St. 347.22, to recover for damages arising out of an incident in which 5-year-old Jason Verrett was injured. Defendant’s liability is dependent upon whether, under the peculiar facts of this case, he is an “owner” of the dog within the language of § 347.22, which provides that “[t]he term ‘owner’ includes any person harboring or keeping a dog.”
Defendant is the owner of a house across the street from the house where the minor plaintiff resided with his parents in the city of Minneapolis. Defendant is single and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hagenau v. MillardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Hunt v. Hazen, Adm.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Elender v. WhiteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
3Cited by16 opinions
- Eric Gross and Adrianne Gross v. Elizabeth Turner and Antonio FloresSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Gilbert v. ChristiansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Tschida v. BerduscoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Neztsosie v. MeyerUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Lewellin Ex Rel. Heirs of Lewellin v. HuberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.