Legal Opinion

Verrett v. Silver

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 2, 1976No. 46041PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Yetka, Justice.

This is a dog-bite action brought by plaintiffs pursuant to Minn. St. 347.22, to recover for damages arising out of an incident in which 5-year-old Jason Verrett was injured. Defendant’s liability is dependent upon whether, under the peculiar facts of this case, he is an “owner” of the dog within the language of § 347.22, which provides that “[t]he term ‘owner’ includes any person harboring or keeping a dog.”

Defendant is the owner of a house across the street from the house where the minor plaintiff resided with his parents in the city of Minneapolis. Defendant is single and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hagenau v. MillardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Hunt v. Hazen, Adm.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Elender v. WhiteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Eric Gross and Adrianne Gross v. Elizabeth Turner and Antonio FloresSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  2. Gilbert v. ChristiansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Tschida v. BerduscoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Neztsosie v. MeyerUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Lewellin Ex Rel. Heirs of Lewellin v. HuberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API