Legal Opinion

Neztsosie v. Meyer

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1994No. 930607PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Associate Chief Justice:

This is an appeal from the district court’s order dismissing Stephen Meyer as defendant in a lawsuit in which plaintiffs alleged that he was strictly liable for damage done by a dog because he was “keeping” the dog under the language of Utah Code Ann. § 18-1-1. Plaintiffs also assert that the district court erred in denying their motions to amend their complaint and to quash the jury-wheel and jury lists. We affirm.

In July of 1989, a dog attacked Kyle Neztsosie while he rode his bicycle in Handing, Utah. Kyle suffered injuries as a result of the attack and was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hancock v. FinchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. Girard v. ApplebyUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. SimsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. McEvoy v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. American Family Mutual Insuran v. David WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Coroles v. SabeyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  4. Kelly v. Hard Money Funding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2004
  5. Pinder v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API