Gilbert v. Christiansen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendant entered on a directed verdict. We affirm.
This is an appeal involving construction of Minn.St. 347.22, the dog-bite statute. The facts are uncontroverted. On February 26, 1974, plaintiff Phyllis Gilbert and her 3-year-old son, Robin Kendrick, were at home in their apartment in Mounds View. A neighbor in the same apartment building, defendant Russell Christiansen, stopped in for a cup of coffee. Accompanying Chris-tiansen was his German shorthaired dog. The dog lay under the kitchen table while coffee was served. Christiansen then…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Siegel v. 1536-46 St. John's Place Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1945
- Hagenau v. MillardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Verrett v. SilverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Collins v. OttoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Denagy v. DoscherNew York Supreme Court · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Strunk v. ZoltanskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Pattermann v. PattermannCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Feister v. BosackMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Neztsosie v. MeyerUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Lewellin Ex Rel. Heirs of Lewellin v. HuberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.