Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Christiansen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 14, 1977No. 46636PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Justice.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendant entered on a directed verdict. We affirm.

This is an appeal involving construction of Minn.St. 347.22, the dog-bite statute. The facts are uncontroverted. On February 26, 1974, plaintiff Phyllis Gilbert and her 3-year-old son, Robin Kendrick, were at home in their apartment in Mounds View. A neighbor in the same apartment building, defendant Russell Christiansen, stopped in for a cup of coffee. Accompanying Chris-tiansen was his German shorthaired dog. The dog lay under the kitchen table while coffee was served. Christiansen then…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Siegel v. 1536-46 St. John's Place Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1945
  2. Hagenau v. MillardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Verrett v. SilverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Collins v. OttoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  5. Denagy v. DoscherNew York Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Strunk v. ZoltanskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Pattermann v. PattermannCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  3. Feister v. BosackMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Neztsosie v. MeyerUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Lewellin Ex Rel. Heirs of Lewellin v. HuberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API