Legal Opinion
Tschida v. Berdusco
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 6, 1990No. C4-90-410PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Dog owners, John and Michelle Berdus-co, appeal from a verdict and judgment in favor of veterinary employee, Julie Tschi-da, under the dog owners liability statute.
PACTS
On August 7, 1986, Julie Tschida went to her summer job as a receptionist at the Highland Animal Hospital in St. Paul. Michelle Berdusco brought her dog to the clinic that morning for surgical sterilization. The dog was taken into a kenneling area and the veterinarian administered a preanesthetic sedative injection.
At about 11:00 in the morning, the veterinarian asked Tschida to go to the kennel area and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Wilcoxen v. PaigeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Verrett v. SilverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Wendland v. AkersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
3Cited by14 opinions
- Armstrong v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Collins v. KenealySupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Anderson v. ChristophersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Armstrong v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Jordan v. LusbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.