Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Hazen, Adm.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1953PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPebby, J.

This is an action for damages brought by the plaintiff Clara Hunt to recover from the defendant G. L. Hazen, as administrator of the estate of Gertrude A. Hattan, deceased.

The plaintiff sustained personal injuries when she was bitten by a dog, admittedly vicious. The dog had been owned and kept by Mr. Hattan, who predeceased his wife, the defendant’s intestate, by a month or two. The question submitted for determination by the jury was whether or not the defendant’s intestate was at the time of the injury the owner, keeper, or harborer of the dog.

After the parties had rested, the defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. McClain ex rel. McClain v. Lewiston Interstate Fair & Racing Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Barber v. HochstrasserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  4. Oakes v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1867
  5. Jaco v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hampton by and Through Hampton v. HammonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Swain v. TillettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Borden v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Verrett v. SilverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Joslyn Ex Rel. Joslyn v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API