Legal Opinion

Hennessey Oil & Gas Co. v. Neely

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 2, 1917No. 7684PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from District Court. Muskogee County; R. P. de Graffenried, Judge. Action by Wilbur M. Neely, Jr., and Charles Bowman, doing business as Neely & Bowman, against the Hennessey Oil & Gas Company and J. M. Foltz, and H. M. Foltz, doing business as Foltz Bros. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

CAMPBELL, G.

This action was commenced in the district court of Muskogee county by Neely & Bowman as partners against the Hennessey Oil & Gas Company and Foltz Bros., a copartnership, for the recovery of the possession of a drilling machine and its complete equipment of the value of $5,-494.76. The case was tried to a jury and a verdict returned for the plaintiffs, and judgment was' accordingly rendered for the plaintiffs. The court denied the motions of both defendants for a new trial, in which motions it was alleged that the verdict returned by the jury was not supported by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. City of Sedan v. ChurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Trower v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. Cit. State Bank of Lawton v. Chattanooga State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Yarnell v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rogers v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WainscottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Alexander v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. De Meglio v. Studebaker Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Futterman v. GottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API