Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Wainscott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 7, 1924No. 13536PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

This action was originally filed in the district court of Stephens county, by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, and the parties will be designated in this opinion as they appeared in the trial court.

The material part of the plaintiff’s petition alleges plaintiff was employed as a laborer connected with the storeroom deparan ent, and was engaged on the date of the injury in unloading heavy springs from cars.. Thau he was working on the car with his foreman. Ray Chaplin. That the springs being-unloaded were from 3^ feet to 4…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Kennon v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Blunt v. LittleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1822
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. CogswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. McMahan v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Bailey v. SissonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Bacon v. WassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API