Legal Opinion

Futterman v. Gott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 6, 1923No. 14503PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

In the trial of this case in the district court of Muskogee county a verdict was rendered by the. jury in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendants filed a motion for, a new trial, which was heard 'by the trial court, and. in overruling the motion for a new trial, the trial judge stated as follows:

“May be X would not agree with the verdict in this case. I hardly know what I would have done' had I been on the jury. But where a jury has been fairly instructed and has passed squarely on the question of fact. I hate to impose my own views in the matter. And the court, therefore, finds that said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. White v. DougalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Hennessey Oil & Gas Co. v. NeelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hall v. PolsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Illinois Oil Co. v. PenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Huffman v. School Board of Independent Consolidated School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Stallaby v. GallagherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API