Trower v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Garfield County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OF FACTS. Ail action was brought in the court below by the defendant in error, Nannie E. Roberts, against the plaintiff in error, George F. Trower, for slander.
Read the full summary
Error from the District Court of Garfield County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OF FACTS. Ail action was brought in the court below by the defendant in error, Nannie E. Roberts, against the plaintiff in error, George F. Trower, for slander. A trial was had, verdict rendered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff for costs, said verdict being rendered on the 23rd day of January, 1905. The judgment of the court was rendered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff for costs, on the same day. On the same day, to-wit: the 23rd day of January, 1905,…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court b3r
Irwin, J.:
The only grounds urged by counsel for plaintiff in error for a reversal of this case are that section 4497 of the general statutes of Oklahoma, for 1893, were not complied with. 'This section is as follows: ■
“Where the grounds for a new trial could not with reasonable diligence have been discovered before, but are discovered after the term at which the verdict, report of referee or decision was rendered or made, the application may be made by petition filed as in other cases not later than the second term after discovery; on which a summons shall issue, be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Baker v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
3Cited by43 opinions
- Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Hughes v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Negrate v. GunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- White v. DougalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.