Legal Opinion
Application of Beck
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 7, 1946No. Patent Appeal 5135PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
The Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirmed the action of the Primary Examiner in finally rejecting claims 14 to 18, inclusive, and claim 24 of appellants’ application for a patent on a magnesium base alloy. The examiner had also rejected claims 21, 22, 23 and 25, but the board reversed his decision as to those claims and allowed the same and the question of their patentability is not before us.
Appellants have appealed from the decision of the board affirming that of the examiner in rejecting claims 14 to 18, inclusive, and claim 24. In this court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- In re DunbarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
- In Re MannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- In re HowardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- In re WilloughbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Knutson v. GallsworthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- United Parts Manufacturing Company v. Lee Motor Products, Inc., and Joseph KuminCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Ellis-Foster Co. v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Frank L. Pierce and Amp, Incorporated v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.