Legal Opinion

In re Howard

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 7, 1931No. 2776PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenroot, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, refusing to allow claims A and B of appellant’s application, filed February 27, 1919, which claims read as follows:

A. Apparatus for feeding molten glass in controllably shaped, suspended mold charges, comprising a container for the glass provided with an impulsion chamber having downwardly converging sides and having a discharge outlet in its bottom, and a discharge controlling implement adapted to reciprocate vertically above said outlet, and having its lower end in said well when said implement is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Waterbury Buckle Co. v. G. E. Prentice Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Application of StanleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  2. Application of John W. Hession, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  3. Application of BeckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  4. In re KeimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  5. Application of Gerald S. Keim and William Donald ThompsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API