Legal Opinion
Ellis-Foster Co. v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 26, 1952No. 10643_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit for patent infringement, the subject matter a patent to Ellis, No. 2,063,542. The trial judge made extensive findings of fact, D.C., 88 F.Supp. 236, all of which favored the plaintiff except one and that one was fatal. He found that the Ellis patent was anticipated by the disclosure in Humphrey patent 2,025,947. This original finding was adhered to, D.C., 100 F.Supp. 594, when, at the plaintiff’s request, we sent the case back, after appeal, for the reception of evidence alleged to be newly discovered and important.
The subject of the patent is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- City of Milwaukee v. Activated Sludge, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
- Dennis v. PitnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Application of Hans Hilmer, Gerhard Korger, Rudi Weyer and Walter AumullerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- Sperry Rand Corporation, in 13,678 v. Knapp-Monarch Company, in 13,679Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Phillips Electronic & Pharmaceutical Industries Corp. v. Thermal & Electronics Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1970
- Application of Hans Hilmer, Gerhard Korger, Rudi Weyer and Walter AumullerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.