Legal Opinion

In re Willoughby

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 22, 1937No. 3734PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Judge

Appellant brings before us for review a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the examiner rejecting fifteen claims (numbered 6, 7, 9, 12, 13,14, 23, 29, 31, 32, 49, 52, 55, 56 and 59) of an application for patent filed. June 8, 1925, for improvement in “Mine Car.” Twenty-one claims stand allowed.

Claims 6 and 31 are illustrative of the subject matter of the rejected claims. They read:

6. In a mine car, flanged sills, a floor portion carried by said sill flanges, axles passing through said sill webs and above said floor portion, axle…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Application of John W. Hession, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  2. In Re FischelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  3. Application of BeckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  4. Application of Richard A. Ward and Robert C. SwitzerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  5. Application of Gerald S. Keim and William Donald ThompsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API