Legal Opinion
Frank L. Pierce and Amp, Incorporated v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 25, 1960No. 15164_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANAHER, Circuit Judge.
Appellant herein, AMP, Inc., for itself as assignee and in behalf of Pierce, brought suit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 145, seeking authorization for the Commissioner to issue a patent on Pierce’s assigned application hereinafter described. After entering findings of fact and conclusions of law in favor of the Commissioner, the District Judge dismissed the action, and this appeal followed.
Macy, claiming to have invented an electrical connector, swore to and filed his application dated December 23, 1946, which was assigned to AMP, Inc. Patent No. 2,600,012 was issued to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- In re WardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- In re DunbarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
- Application of StrainCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Application of Thomas F. FaciusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of Charles A. MathewsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- John F. Cody v. Aktiebolaget FlymoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Application of Vincent J. Frilette and Paul B. WeiszCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- John F. Cody v. Aktiebolaget FlymoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972