Goehring v. Chapman University
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCONNELL, P. J.
This case arises from misrepresentations Chapman University (Chapman) made to plaintiffs, students in the inaugural class of its law school, and its violations of Business and Professions Code section 6061, which requires written disclosures of facts pertinent to a law school’s unaccredited status. We hold as matters of first impression that Business and Professions Code section 6061 (1) confers a private right of action for the refund of tuition from an unaccredited law school that violates written disclosure requirements; (2) is not subject to the exhaustion of…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- OCM Principal Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. CIBC World Markets Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Mabry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Louie Hung Kwei Lu v. Hawaiian Gardens Casino, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
- Troester v. Starbucks CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Beckwith v. DahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.