Legal Opinion

Goehring v. Chapman University

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 2004No. D039816PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCONNELL, P. J.

This case arises from misrepresentations Chapman University (Chapman) made to plaintiffs, students in the inaugural class of its law school, and its violations of Business and Professions Code section 6061, which requires written disclosures of facts pertinent to a law school’s unaccredited status. We hold as matters of first impression that Business and Professions Code section 6061 (1) confers a private right of action for the refund of tuition from an unaccredited law school that violates written disclosure requirements; (2) is not subject to the exhaustion of…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. OCM Principal Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. CIBC World Markets Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Mabry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Louie Hung Kwei Lu v. Hawaiian Gardens Casino, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Troester v. Starbucks CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Beckwith v. DahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API