Legal Opinion

Daro v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 3, 2007No. A111947, A112134PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McGUINESS, P. J.

In this action brought by tenants of an apartment building under California’s unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, 1 § 17200 et seq.) (UCL), the trial court found that the appellant property owners had committed an unfair business practice by attempting to sell subdivided interests in property without obtaining the “public report” that must be provided to potential buyers pursuant to the Subdivided Lands Act (§ 11000 et seq.). The court described appellants’ unfair business practice as purchasing residential rental propertiés, subdividing them through the vehicle…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kasky v. Nike, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. CALIFORNIANS FOR DISAB. RIGHTS v. Mervyn'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. McKaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Jenkins v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Mireles v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
  4. Graham v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Environmental Protection Information Center v. California Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API