O'Brien v. Thomas
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
—Plaintiff, who was an attaching and is now an unsatisfied judgment creditor in the case of O’Brien v. Friedman, number 373,472 in the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles, in this action sues the marshal of such municipal court for damages for allegedly unlawfully releasing to a third party claimant a sum of money which had been paid into the custody of said marshal under a writ of attachment levied in such prior action, and from a judgment in favor of the defendant marshal prosecutes this appeal.
The money had been garnisheed as a debt owing to the attachment action defendant Friedman…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burlingame v. TraegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Van Vorce v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- First National Bank of Marysville v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Sparks v. BucknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Lorah v. BiscailuzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hammons v. SCHRUNKOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. BiscailuzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Adir International, LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. BiscailuzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. BiscailuzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957