Legal Opinion

Van Vorce v. Thomas

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1937No. Civ. No. 11034PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J., pro tem.

Judgment was entered against a deputy marshal of the Municipal Court of Los Angeles County for the damages occasioned by his assault upon plaintiff during the service of process in claim and delivery, but ■as to the marshal himself a judgment of nonsuit was entered. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of nonsuit, relying not upon any-active or advisory participation of the marshal in the affair, for there was none, but solely upon the theory that the marshal is civilly liable for the damages inflicted by the torts of his deputies which occur in the discharge of their…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Michel v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Foley v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Abbott v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Whitney v. ButterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Bower v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. County of Placer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Orris v. RobertsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Fernelius v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. City & County of Denver v. RinkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Hammons v. SCHRUNKOregon Supreme Court · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API