Legal Opinion

Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Biscailuz

California Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1957No. L. A. 24226PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment, rendered by the court sitting without a jury, in its action to recover from defendant sheriff of Los Angeles County, two of his deputies,1 and the sureties upon their respective bonds, a sum of money which plaintiff claims to have lost by reason of an alleged breach of duty by the defendant officers acting in their official capacity.

Plaintiff contends that the sheriff, acting through his deputies, wrongfully ordered the Bank of America, hereinafter referred to as the bank, to release from attachment certain funds held by the bank, and that the bank…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Vallindras v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Aetna Insurance v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  4. First National Bank of Marysville v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Whitney v. ButterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Collins v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Rubinow v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. ShawcrossNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Arrieta v. MahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. United States Overseas Airlines v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API