Lorah v. Biscailuz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff, alleging physical injury and false imprisonment when she was arrested upon a felony charge, brought suit for damages against the arresting officer, who was a deputy sheriff of Los Angeles County, and against the sheriff of said county and the latter’s official bondsmen. ■A general demurrer on behalf of the sheriff and his bondsmen was sustained without leave to amend, and from the resulting judgment plaintiff appeals. '
While the general rule is that a sheriff is liable for the torts of his deputies committed in the performance of the latters’ official acts or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Michel v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Foley v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Abbott v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Sunter v. FraserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. Standard Accident Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Van Vorce v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- State v. ReichertIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
- Union Bank & Trust Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Bowman v. HaywardUtah Supreme Court · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.