Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sparks v. Buckner

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1936No. Civ. No. 1734PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MUNDO, J., pro tem.

This is an action against the sheriff and his official bondsman for negligence in releasing property taken by the sheriff under attachment without receiving a sufficient bond for the release of the attached property.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff filed an attachment suit against Peppers Fruit Company; that an attachment was levied by the sheriff upon the property of said company; that this property had a value of five thousand dollars ($5,000) ; that two days after the levy the sheriff received from the Peppers Fruit Company, as principal, and Columbia Casualty…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Curiac v. PackardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Burlingame v. TraegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Christal v. . KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Bridges v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. In re Beaver Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Vallindras v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Bass v. StoddCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. Reynolds v. LermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. United States Overseas Airlines v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. O'Brien v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API