Legal Opinion

Burlingame v. Traeger

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1929No. Docket No. 6240PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNELL, J., pro tem.

This appeal is taken from a judgment entered in favor of the defendants upon the failure of the plaintiff to amend her complaint after demurrers sustained and therefore the only question before us is as to the sufficiency of the facts stated to constitute a cause of action against the defendant sheriff and his deputy.

An understandable presentation of the points involved in the discussion of this question requires us to set forth those portions of the pleadings which attempt to allege the gravamen of the plaintiff’s cause of action. After alleging that at the time of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Estate of AppleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. In Re NowakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. People v. Tinder & SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Pasadena University v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  3. People v. WeitzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Metzenbaum v. MetzenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Rudley v. TobiasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API