Legal Opinion

City of Montesano v. Blair

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1895No. 1724PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from, Superior Court, Chehalis County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

This action was .brought in the court below to foreclose certain street grade assessment liens. There was a decree for the plaintiff, from, which this appeal was prosecuted.

Counsel for respondent, in his-brief, insists that this court cannot consider any evidence because no exceptions were taken to the findings and.conclusions of the lower court; nor were findings tendered or requested by appellants. This court has repeatedly held that, under the act of 1893 it could not consider evidence where exceptions had not been taken to the findings.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pacific Paving Co. v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Town of Elma v. CarneyWashington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bishop v. AverillWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Clifford v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Peters v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Ramey v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Snohomish River Boom Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API