Wright v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Claypool, J., entered October 9, 1914, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This is the third case to reach this court arising out of contracts made by the city of Tacoma for the construction of what is known as the Green river water system. The two prior cases were McHugh v. Tacoma, 76 Wash. 127, 135 Pac. 1011, and International Contract Co. v. Tacoma, 79 Wash. 311, 140 Pac. 373. The contract here involved, in its general provisions, is substantially the same as the contracts in those two cases. For a statement of the preliminary facts leading up to the letting of the contract involved in this case, reference is made to the cases mentioned.
By written contract…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Parks v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Weaver v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Horrell v. California, Oregon & Washington Homebuilders' Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Peters v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Hansen v. RothausWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- Cochrane v. ForbesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Rosellini v. BancheroWashington Supreme Court · 1974
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.