Farnandis v. Great Northern Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, T'allman, J., entered March 14, 1905, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action against railroad companies for damage to buildings caused by the construction of a tunnel.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.
The respondents are the owners of a ground lease of lot 2 in block 6 of Denny’s Eourth addition to Seattle. They have erected and own two brick buildings thereon, which buildings are leased and used for lodging and hotel purposes. One of these buildings is known as the “Lotus” building, and the other as the “Pleasanton” building. The respondents Earnandis and wife and Hamm own the whole of the Pleasanton building and an undivided one-half of the *490Lotus building.' The respondents Morris and wife own an undivided half of the Lotus building. In the years 1903 and 1901, the appellant railway…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Gilmore v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. ReaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Brown v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Seal v. Puget Sound Loan & Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Patrick v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- City of Muskogee v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.