Legal Opinion

Foster & Kleiser Co. v. Special Site Sign Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 22, 1936No. 8069PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TtrTT WILBUR, Circuí Ju ge.

This action was brought by the appellee-plaintiff to recover damages under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of July 2, 1890 chapter 647, §§ 1, 7, 26 Stat. 209, 210, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 15 note), because of an alleged conspiracy on the part of the appellant-defendant corporation to secure and maintain a monopoly of the outdoor advertising business in the Pacific Coast states,

The business of both parties is that of placing advertising matter upon billboards located in various places in the Pacific Coast states. They sell advertising space upon these billboards owned and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Coronado Coal Co. v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Klehr v. A. O. Smith Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Marietta Page v. Telford WorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  5. Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API