Legal Opinion

Shaw v. People Ex Rel. Chiang

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 2009No. C058479PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, J.

This case considers the effect on the state budgetary process of a bond initiative measure (Proposition 116) almost two decades after it was approved by voters. Specifically, we consider the legality of the Legislature’s creation of the Mass Transportation Fund, the legality of the Legislature’s transfer of a portion of spillover gas tax revenue to the Mass Transportation Fund and the Legislature’s appropriation of $1.2 billion 1 from the Mass Transportation Fund and the Public Transportation Account for the 2007-2008 budget year in light of Proposition 116.

Josh Shaw,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. SaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Cnty. of San Diego v. Comm'n on State MandatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. People v. HannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. County of San Bernardino v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API