Legal Opinion
County of San Bernardino v. Cohen
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 2015No. C074413PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, J.
When the Legislature dissolved redevelopment agencies, it provided that any agreement between the redevelopment agency and the municipal government that created the redevelopment agency is not an enforceable obligation. (Health & Saf. Code, former § 34171, subd. (d)(2) (Stats. 2011-2012, 1st Ex. Sess., ch. 5X §7; Stats. 2012, ch. 26, § 6) (hereafter, section 34171(d)(2)).) Here, plaintiff County of San Bernardino loaned the San Bernardino County Redevelopment Agency $10 million. When the redevelopment agency was dissolved, $9 million of those funds remained in the former…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Brentwood v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- County of Sonoma v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Grass Valley v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. City of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- City of Anaheim v. BoslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- City of Anaheim v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- City of Brentwood v. Department of FinanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.