Legal Opinion
California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 6, 2017No. C075930; C075954PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUARTE, J.
These two consolidated cases involve the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (the Act) (Health & Saf. Code, § 38500 et seq.; see Stats. 2006, ch. 488; § 1, p. 3419, enacting Assem. Bill No. 32 (2005-2006 Reg. Sess.), popularly known as “AB 32”).1 The Act was passed by a simple majority vote of both legislative houses. Its general purpose is to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to protect the environment.
Plaintiffs and allied amici curiae do not quarrel with the Act or its goals, but attack one part of the implementing regulations adopted by the State Air…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Paul Conti and Conti Corporation (As Owner of F/v Providenza) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nat'l Asian Am. Coal. v. Newsom, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Templo v. State, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Hart High-Voltage Apparatus Repair & Testing Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. Shah, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Crane v. DolihiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.