Leckwee v. Gibson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, C.J.
The plaintiff in his motions after verdict and here on appeal contends (1) that there is no credible evidence to support a finding of causal negligence against him, that the jury’s answers should be changed accordingly, and j udgment entered in his behalf, or (2) that the 75 percent assessment of negligence against him is disproportionate as a matter of law and that a new trial should be ordered, or (3) that a new trial should be ordered in the interest of justice. We conclude the comparative negligence answers are disproportionate as a matter of law and reverse the judgment and order a new…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Puhl v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Cirillo v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Chille v. HowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lievrouw v. RothCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Westfall Ex Rel. Terwilliger v. KottkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Eileen W. Legue v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Totsky v. Riteway Bus Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Sachsenmaier v. MittlestadtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.