Legal Opinion

Lievrouw v. Roth

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 3, 1990No. 89-1369PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

Julie Ann Roth and Classified Insurance Coloration appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict that found Roth to be ninety-five percent causally negligent in connection with an automobile accident that injured Dennis Lievrouw. The jury found Lievrouw to be five percent causally negligent, and awarded him approximately $58,000 in compensatory damages and $5,000 in punitive damages.

Roth and Classified assert eight grounds for reversal. First, they contend that the trial court should not have admitted evidence that in October of 1982 Roth had killed a four-year-old pedestrian as the result…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Eaves v. PennCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  5. State v. PharrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Miller v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Jacque v. Steenberg Homes, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Strenke v. HognerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Sharp Ex Rel. Gordon v. Case Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Loveridge v. ChartierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API