Legal Opinion

Sachsenmaier v. Mittlestadt

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 19, 1988No. 87-1563PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyse, J.

This is an appeal of a judgment apportioning seventy percent negligence to Timothy Mittlestadt and his insurance carrier, American Family Insurance Group, and awarding the Sachsenmaiers double costs pursuant to sec. 807.01(3), Stats. The case was tried to the court sitting without a jury. Mittles-tadt contends that the trial court’s apportionment of negligence was clearly erroneous and that the court erred by finding a letter from Sachsenmaier’s counsel to be an offer of settlement under sec. 807.01, thereby authorizing Sachsenmaier to recover double costs. We conclude that the evidence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Noll v. Dimiceli's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  3. DeMars v. LaPourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Stewart v. WulfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. White Ex Rel. Donovan v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Naranjo v. PaullNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  3. Dillen v. Healthone, L.L.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Bauer v. Piper Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  5. Kettner v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API