Legal Opinion

Puhl v. Milwaukee Automobile Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1959PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

Joseph Fetzer and his insurer contend the trial court erred in refusing to hold that Fetzer as a matter of law was not causally negligent as to management and control and lookout. Fetzer contends that he did all he could to avoid the collision.

There was credible evidence to sustain the jury finding that Fetzer was causally negligent as to lookout and management and control. Fetzer was driving south on Highway *347175 at 35 miles an hour. His wife was sitting next to him and the other plaintiff sat in the rear seat of the car. Anna Fetzer first saw the Myles car as it was entering Highway 175…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Woods v. LancetNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Dietrich v. Inhabitants of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Allaire v. St. Luke's HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Amann v. FaidyIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Hornbuckle v. Plantation Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Otto E. Pritchard v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  3. Sinkler v. KnealeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. Kwaterski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API