Legal Opinion

Golden State Orchards v. Harter

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 1928No. Docket No. 3109PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an action in claim and delivery for the redelivery to the possession of the plaintiff by the defendant of 370 tons of dried French prunes and 80% tons of dried Muir peaches, of the alleged approximate aggregate value of $70,000, or in case such redelivery is not had or cannot be made, that plaintiff be awarded judgment in the said sum of $70,000, as the value thereof, together with the sum of $10,000 as damages for the wrongful detention of said fruit by defendant after demand was made by plaintiff for the return to it of the possession thereof.

■ The plaintiff is a California…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Connell v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Carlson v. SheehanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. California Cured Fruit Assn. v. StellingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Automobile, Truck, Tractor & Implement Co. v. SalladayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Sidney v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. PhotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Kirkman Corp. v. OwensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Morton Regent Enters., Inc. v. Leadtec Cal., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. People v. PhotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API