Legal Opinion

California Cured Fruit Assn. v. Stelling

California Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1904No. S.F. No. 3285PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

This action was brought to recover the possession of two hundred and twenty-five tons of dried prunes or the sum of $17,543.14, the value thereof, in case a delivery cannot be had.

The case was tried before the court and findings filed, upon which judgment was ordered and entered in favor of plaintiff as prayed. Defendants bring this appeal from the judgment and order denying their motion for a new trial.

The defendants F. E. and H. G. Stelling (who will hereafter be called Stelling Bros.), in March, 1900, entered intd a written contract with the plaintiff, which recited that, in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Spring Valley Water Works v. San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Eversdon v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Bakersfield Town Hall Ass'n v. ChesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Rondell v. FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Fulkerson v. StilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Prichard v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Leaf v. ReynoldsIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API