Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Photo

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1941No. Crim. 612PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Appellant Gus Photo, also known as Constantine Photopoulos, and Pete Adams were each charged in separate informations with the crime of grand theft in that they did on November 14, 1940, wilfully and feloniously steal, take and carry away 398 boxes of oranges of the value of $398, the personal property of Mrs. J. A. Prescott. Gus Photo was also charged with a prior conviction of a felony which he admitted. After a plea of not guilty a jury was waived by both Photo and Adams. The two cases were consolidated for trial by stipulation. Both defendants were found guilty by the trial court and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Burke v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Groover v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  4. People v. DevineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. People v. EastmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. CovarrubiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. WootenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. People v. EitzenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API