Legal Opinion

Stengel v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 29, 1911No. 584PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7145 (T. 1). 31164).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of General Appraisers affirming the assessment of the surveyor of customs at the port of Pittsburg on certain merchandise reported to him to consist of “ zinc enamel sheets.” The articles' were assessed for duty at the rate of 45 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 199 of *138the tariff act of 1909 for - articles composed of “* * * zinc * * * or other metal, and whether partly or wholly manufactured, forty-five per centum ad valorem.” They are claimed by the importer to be dutiable at If cents per pound under paragraph 194 of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dejonge v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Myers v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Lunham & Moore v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. ProsserCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Burn Strauss, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  4. Sandvik Steel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  5. W. R. Filbin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API