Legal Opinion

Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 8, 1970No. C.D. 4143PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Newman, Judge:

These three consolidated protests concern the proper rate of duty on certain metal articles imported from West Germany in 1962.

The merchandise is described on the commercial invoices as “Muntz Metal Plates” and “Tube Sheet blanks, Muntz metal, hot rolled” in protests 66/1272 and 66/14957(B) repeotively. These articles were assessed with duty by the Government at the rates of 17 or 19 per centum ad valorem, depending on the date of entry, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, covering “Other” articles not specially provided for,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. FrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Universal Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Stengel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Edward Hyman Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  5. Sciaky Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  2. E. R. Hawthorne & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  3. Overton & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  4. Sandvik Steel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  5. Sandvik Steel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API